Did you know that the NSA can track the location of your phone even when it is turned off and the batteries have been removed?

     Did you know that the NSA can track the location of your phone even when it is turned off and the batteries have been removed?  This admission went largely unnoticed in a Washington Post report entitled NSA growth fueled by need to target terrorists.  In the article, writer Dana Priest details how teams of NSA employees stationed around the globe are dedicated to tracking phones in real time.  By September 2004, a new NSA technique enabled the agency to find cellphones even when they were turned off. JSOC troops called this “The Find,” and it gave them thousands of new targets, including members of a burgeoning al-Qaeda-sponsored insurgency in Iraq, according to members of the unit.
At the same time, the NSA developed a new computer linkup called the Real Time Regional Gateway into which the military and intelligence officers could feed every bit of data or seized documents and get back a phone number or list of potential targets. It also allowed commanders to see, on a screen, every type of surveillance available in a given territory.
     The technique by which the NSA can wiretap cellphones even when they are turned off and powered down is most likely being performed with the complicity of telecommunications companies who have proven friendly to NSA snooping. Trojan horse programs disguised behind routine system updates are the likely method through which the NSA gains direct access to millions of Americans’ cellphones and other devices.
     “You may recall the fact that Verizon and AT&T notably did not sign the collective letter asking the government to allow affected companies to release information on government requests for data,” writes Tim Cushing. “Given this background, it’s not unimaginable that Verizon and AT&T would accommodate the NSA (and FBI) if it wished to use their update systems to push these trojans.”
As we have also previously highlighted, terms of agreement for many of the apps you download to your smartphone now use your microphone to listen to you and your camera to take pictures of you without your knowledge.
     The notion of the federal government tracking your location via your cellphone is particularly prescient given yesterday’s report concerning the DHS-funded mesh network system that Seattle Police eventually intend to roll out across the city, but have temporarily been forced to deactivate due to a privacy outcry.
Aruba Networks, the company behind the system of wi-fi hubs which can record the last 1,000 locations of cellphones belonging to anyone in the coverage area, bragged in their promotional material that the grid could track “rogue” or “unassociated” devices.
     In other words, even if you do not allow your phone to connect to such wi-fi networks, they can still access your device, record its current and historical location, as well as download private information from your apps and other settings.

Facebook @ https://www.facebook.com/paul.j.watson.71

FOLLOW Paul Joseph Watson @ https://twitter.com/PrisonPlanet

Mark,Rowe,David,Rowe,Nina,Dougherty,Clifford,Dougherty,Anita,Ferguson,Virginia,Ferguson,William,Jones,Frederick,Jones,Charles,Rowe
Jacqueline,Kennedy,Esther,Rowe,Ralph,Rowe,Judy,Garland,Ethel,Kennedy,Robert,Kennedy,John,Kennedy,international,affairs,world,economic,domination,and,control,policy,makers,decisions,for,material,gain,persuasion,of,the,masses

http://youtu.be/Afb8H-1fcYU


This is a list of people who are directly and indirectly related to Mark Ralph Rowe.  Some names on this list are people who had prior association with those people directly or indirectly related to Mark Ralph Rowe and or independent or not independently connected to Mark Ralph Rowe's immediate or extended family of both his maternal mother and paternal father.


Mark Rowe

David Rowe

Nina Dougherty

Clifford Dougherty

Anita Ferguson

Virginia Ferguson

William Jones

Frederick Jones

Charles Rowe

Jacqueline Kennedy

Esther Rowe

Ralph Rowe

Judy Garland

Ethel Kennedy

Robert Kennedy

John Kennedy


http://youtu.be/Afb8H-1fcYU


A LIST OF THE QUANTITY FOR THE AMOUNT OF TIME THAT I HAVE LIKED AND UN-LIKED A COMMENT POST ON FACEBOOK FOR A CONTINUOUS TIME PERIOD.


                                     LOG RECORD

FRIDAY NOVEMBER 15, 2013 AT 11:30 AM:  17 MINUTES

FRIDAY NOVEMBER 15, 2013 AT 11:38 AM:   4 MINUTES

The Future of Eugenics. Eugenics, although based on the science of genetics, is not itself a science, for it must above all concern itself with social values, with the question: Whither mankind?

     The Future of Eugenics.  Eugenics, although based on the science of genetics, is not itself a science, for it must above all concern itself with social values, with the question:  Whither mankind?  Perhaps general agreement could be had that freedom from gross physical or mental defects and the possession of sound health, high intelligence, general adaptability, and nobility of spirit are the major goals toward which eugenics should aim; perhaps even that diversity of nature is better than uniformity of type.  But how far ought selective reproduction to interfere with human freedoms?  Genetically, as in other respects, "there is so much bad in the best of us and so much good in the worst of us" that it is hard to assess the worth of the manifest hereditary characteristics are the product of environment, particularly for those qualities that are eugenics' major concern: sound health, high intelligence, and the like.  The Jukes and Kallikaks were horrible examples of degenerate humanity, but what might they have been in a better world?  Were their alcoholism, their crime, and their vice inescapable products of their genes?  It seems very doubtful.  Only the experiment of putting them from earliest infancy into an optimum environment--not forgetting that it need not be the same for everyone--than to modify gene frequencies by wise selection.  Once mankind has produced an approximation of that optimum environment, the eugenics task will be much simpler.  In fact, the natural selection exerted by such an environment may make eugenics quite unnecessary.

                                              -H. Bentley Glass

based on the science of genetics science social values with the question Whither mankind Jukes and Kallikaks sound health high intelligence and the like north carolina virginia

JerryKendallIsAKiller.com

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 10-1755 ____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. THOMAS S. PENDLETON, Appellant ____________ APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE (D.C. Crim. No. 08-cr-59-1) District Judge:  Honorable Gregory M. Sleet ____________ Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a) March 14, 2011 ____________ Before: RENDELL, BARRY and CHAGARES, Circuit Judges (Opinion Filed: April 12, 2011) ____________ Eleni Kousoulis, Esq.  Daniel I. Siegel, Esq.  Office of the Federal Public Defender  800 King Street  Suite 200  Wilmington, DE 19801  Counsel for Appellant

based on the science of genetics science social values with the question Whither mankind Jukes and Kallikaks sound health high intelligence and the like north carolina virginia

http://thomas-pendelton.blogspot.com/?m=1


based on the science of genetics science social values with the question Whither mankind Jukes and Kallikaks sound health high intelligence and the like north carolina virginia

based on the science of genetics science social values with the question Whither mankind Jukes and Kallikaks sound health high intelligence and the like north carolina virginia

When Congress enacted SORNA, it was particularly concerned about the transient nature of many sex offenders and did not want to lose track of sex offenders when they moved from state to state. United States v. Howell, 552 F.3d 709, 716-17 (8th Cir. 2009). Recognizing this, the Eighth Circuit “reject[ed] the suggestion that a savvy sex offender can move to a different city and avoid having to update his SORNA registration by sleeping in a different shelter or other location every night.” United States v. Voice, 622 F.3d 870, 875 (8th Cir. 2010). Given Pendleton‟s extensive travel, the government argues that a similar concern regarding transience is present in this case. Under the relevant provision of 42 U.S.C. § 16913(a), “[a] sex offender shall register, and keep the registration current, in each jurisdiction where the offender resides, where the offender is an employee, and where the offender is a student.” A “jurisdiction” is, among other things, “[a] State.” 42 U.S.C. § 16911(10)(A). “The term „resides‟ means, with respect to an individual, the location of the individual‟s home or other place where the individual habitually lives.” 42 U.S.C. § 16911(13). A sex offender must “appear in person” in at least one of the applicable jurisdictions “not later than 3 business days after each change of name, residence, employment, or student status . . . and inform that jurisdiction of all changes in the information required for that offender in the sex offender registry.” 42 U.S.C. § 16913(c).  Pendleton was convicted not under § 16913, which does not have an enforcement provision, but under 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a), which provides that a person commits a crime when he or she “(1) is required to register under the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act; (2) . . . (B) travels in interstate or foreign commerce . . . ; and (3) knowingly fails to register or update a registration as required by the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act.” In other words, “[o]nce a person becomes subject to SORNA‟s registration requirements . . . that person can be convicted under § 2250 if he thereafter travels and then fails to register.” Carr v. United States, 130 S. Ct. 2229, 2236 (2010).  Pendleton does not dispute on appeal.

based on the science of genetics science social values with the question Whither mankind Jukes and Kallikaks sound health high intelligence and the like north carolina virginia

This is the Central Intelligence Agency address and the phone number of officer.  His Jerry Kendall previous home address in Northern Virgina is: 2003 Wellfleet Court Falls Church 22043 and work address was 934 Dolley Madison Blvd McLean, VA
(703) 874-0767
He current lives in Oregon.

based on the science of genetics science social values with the question Whither mankind Jukes and Kallikaks sound health high intelligence and the like north carolina virginia

and then on March 10th, he traveled to Wilmington and was arrested. Pendleton had a one-way airplane ticket to travel on March 12, 2008 from JFK to Prague, Czech Republic. II. JURISDICTION AND STANDARD OF REVIEW The District Court had jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3231, and we have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. Our review of the Court‟s denial of Pendleton‟s motion for judgment of acquittal, its construction of SORNA, and its conclusion that SORNA is constitutional is plenary. III. ANALYSIS The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, which included SORNA, 1“was enacted to close the loopholes in previous sex offender registration legislation and to standardize registration across the states.” United States v. Shenandoah, 595 F.3d 151, 154 (3d Cir. 2010). In response to previous legislation, by 1996 every state and the District of Columbia had mandatory sex offender registration laws, but “SORNA creates a national sex offender registry with the goal of eliminating inconsistencies among state laws.” Id. 1Title I of the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 was itself named the “Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act” (SORNA), and both 42 U.S.C. § 16913, which contains the sex offender registration requirement, and 18 U.S.C. § 2250, which contains the criminal enforcement provision under which Pendleton was convicted, were enacted through Title I of that Act. Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006, Pub. L. No. 109-248, §§ 101, 113, 141, 120 Stat. 587, 590, 593-94, 60102 (2006).  As defined by statute, “SORNA” thus includes both §§ 16913 and 2250. In United States v. Shenandoah, we upheld the constitutionality of “SORNA” under the Commerce Clause, but did not specifically address § 16913. See United States v. Shenandoah, 595 F.3d 151, 160-61 (3rd Ctr. 2010)
Will Add more.